Kuhn came to realize that Aristotle Aristotle was actually engaged in perceptive ancient natural philosophy rather than erroneous modern physics. Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The (Kuhn) Paradigm shifts Science, history of Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought (1962) Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought, Kuhn Explores (1962) Scientific Thought, Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in (1962) Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The (Kuhn) Paradigm shifts Science, history of North America 1962: Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought United States 1962: Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought Science and technology 1962: Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought Historiography 1962: Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought Philosophy 1962: Kuhn Explores Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Thought Kuhn, Thomas S. Although some scholars have explained the provenance of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions as an outgrowth of the political situation in Cold War America in general and at Harvard University in particular, Kuhn himself attributed the basic insights behind his book to an epiphany he experienced while studying Aristotle’s works on motion. Following his undergraduate and graduate education in physics at Harvard University, Kuhn changed-under the influence of his study of science’s past achievements and through the mentoring of James Bryant Conant-from a physicist into a historian of science. Kuhn was a characteristic of his own life both before and after the publication of his greatest work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). The phenomenon of change in science that so fascinated Thomas S. His analysis profoundly affected not only historians of science but also scholars in many other disciplines. He asserted instead that the sciences underwent periodic revolutionary shifts in their underlying paradigms that could not be understood in terms of simple improvement or development. Kuhn rejected models of the history of science that were based on progress or evolution in scientific thought.
In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas S.
0 kommentar(er)
